Does Jesus' Use of the Sleeping Terminology Have Anything to Do with Resuscitation?

Video

Summary

Does it mean anything that both Lazarus and Jairus’ daughter came back to life after Jesus said they were “sleeping?” Does “sleeping” necessarily predict eventual resuscitation? The answer to this question is no. Sleep as a metaphor/euphemism is more linked with death than resuscitation, and other evidence from the Bible helps us show that the normal way to take things is actually that those who are “sleeping” are dead. That these two specific individuals happened to be resuscitated does not change the fact that the metaphorical/euphemistic usage of sleep is linked to death, not resuscitation.

Timestamps

0:000:00 - Intro and outline
01:2601:26 - Q: Does Jesus’ use of the sleeping terminology have anything to to do with resuscitation?
02:4502:45 - Comments on our specific cases
03:3803:38 - Lazarus’ case
07:0407:04 - Jairus’ daughter’s case
10:2910:29 - The basic concept: sleeping is primarily associated with death, not resuscitation
13:2613:26 - More explanation about how sleeping and death are tightly linguistically coupled
21:5721:57 - Summary and outro

Content

Q: Does Jesus’ use of the sleeping terminology have anything to to do with resuscitation?

Could the reason that Jesus used the sleeping terminology in John 11:11 and Matthew 9:24 have anything to do with the fact that these individuals would be resuscitated and wake up again? (As opposed to people who die but are not resuscitated)?

Comments on our specific cases

I think Jesus’ use of the sleeping terminology in John 11 and Matthew 9 is completely separate from his foreknowledge that these folks would be resuscitated rather than staying dead.

Lazarus’ case

In the case of Lazarus, the euphemism would be just as true in their culture if Lazarus never was resuscitated and stayed dead. That would be how the euphemism was mostly used in practice, after all, since it would be far more normal for people to stay dead than to be raised back to life.

Jairus’ daughter’s case

And in the case of Jairus’ daughter, like I argued, even though she was actually dead and Jesus knew so, He said what he did (that is, took advantage of the euphemism people clearly knew culturally) to make things purposefully ambiguous to others, so that neither He nor the girl and her family would receive as much negative attention from it.

The basic concept: sleeping is primarily associated with death, not resuscitation

In neither case was his usage of this terminology really directly tied to the resuscitation, even though it turned up in both of these places. That is, I see the association of sleeping as being primarily with death, not resuscitation.

We also ought to note that there are places where sleeping is mentioned alongside death but not resuscitation (e.g., 1 Kings 2:10—“Then David slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David”), and also places where resuscitation is mentioned but not sleeping (e.g., Paul’s raising of Eutychus in Acts 20:7-12). These observations mean that we ought to understand the sleep references as being primarily associated with death, not resuscitation.

More explanation about how sleeping and death are tightly linguistically coupled

The verb for raising someone from death is the same as awakening/rousing someone from sleep in both Hebrew and Greek—see Hebrew’s qutz (קוּץ) and Greek’s egeiro (ἐγείρω), and the relevant concordance entries for this type of usage (that is, when the verbs are being used of death not sleep).

You might especially compare passages that clearly describe death as a perpetual sleep from which one does not awaken. For example:

  • Jeremiah 51:39, 57;
  • Job 14:12

Or passages that describe those that have been buried as sleeping in the ground:

  • Daniel 12:2

So it’s not just by accident that the verbs overlap in usage, but because of an enduring semantic relationship between the concepts, present in English as well (perhaps most commonly in poetic phrasing—cf. John Donne’s famous Sonnet “Death, be not proud”), and actually most other languages too I’d reckon. Not that I’ve done a formal study of it, but it just makes sense for us humans to associate these two concepts that have similar surface appearances.

Video/audio transcript

00:0000:00 - hey guys so tonight we’re going to be doing a follow-on video to a previous one we did talking about Jesus’s use of
00:0700:07 - sleeping terminology in John chapter 11 and Matthew chapter 9 and now we’re just going to be looking at a couple things
00:1300:13 - in a bit more detail so here are the topics that we’re going to be going over here uh the
00:1900:19 - follow on question that we’re going to be talking about is does Jesus’s use of the sleeping terminology have anything
00:2600:26 - to do with resuscitation so basically is he using uh the word sleep rather than death simply because we know that these
00:3400:34 - people will be resuscitated and we’re going to talk about the two cases that we’ve already been focusing on so
00:3900:39 - lazarus’s case in John chapter 11 and gyrus daughter’s case in Matthew chapter 9 and uh we’re going to argue that
00:4700:47 - sleeping is actually primarily associated with death not resuscitation so the answer to this particular
00:5300:53 - question is no not really um Jesus is using sleep as a euphemism for death and then taking advantage of the
01:0001:00 - associations there rather than really it having very much to do with resuscitation directly and then we’re
01:0501:05 - just going to talk a little bit about that linguistic connection between death and sleep and so this isn’t just Greek
01:1101:11 - and Hebrew this is sort of most languages in fact kind of have a tie between these two concepts and that kind
01:1701:17 - of explains why Jesus uses death for or sorry sleep for death in these cases as well so it’s kind of nothing out of the
01:2401:24 - ordinary we would say okay so first thing just going over that question again in a little bit more
01:3401:34 - detail here um we’re just going to pose it as this could the reason that Jesus used sleeping terminology in John
01:4301:43 - chapter 11 and Matthew chapter 9 so that is with Lazarus and gyrus his daughter have anything to do with the fact that
01:5001:50 - these individuals would be resuscitated and wake up again as opposed to people who die but are not resuscitated and so
01:5701:57 - the idea here behind this question is sort of of if Jesus knew that these people would wake up and we know that
02:0502:05 - people from sleep wake up then maybe that’s why he would use the word sleep here instead of death like it could be
02:1102:11 - sort of foreshadowing if you will the idea that these people would uh be raised from the dead resuscitated come
02:1802:18 - back to life in a way that most people who die are not and so could Jesus have been using this uh sort of to say that
02:2602:26 - no these people aren’t Dead uh they are going to come back to life as sort of a a like a word choice to reflect that for
02:3502:35 - knowledge um and so could that be why Jesus used this terminology of sleeping rather than just coming right out and
02:4302:43 - saying directly that they were dead and so the short answer to this question is I really don’t think this is
02:5202:52 - the case I think Jesus’s use of the sleeping terminology in John 11 and Matthew chapter 9 is actually completely
03:0003:00 - separate from his foreign knowledge that these folks would be resuscitated rather than staying dead so Jesus obviously
03:0603:06 - knew that he was going to raise them from the dead but I don’t think that he was using this terminology of sleep
03:1203:12 - rather than death uh just because he knew that they would be resuscitated I think he’s using it as we shall see just
03:2003:20 - because that is such a a common Association uh between these words between sleep and death so in Greek and
03:2703:27 - Hebrew and English in most other languages too presumably that he’s using this because sleep is so tightly coupled
03:3303:33 - with death and it really doesn’t have very much to do with resuscitation on the whole of
03:4103:41 - it so in the case of Lazarus in John chapter 11 the euphemism uh that is using sleep as a euphemism for death
03:5103:51 - well it would actually be just as true in their culture if Lazarus was never resuscitated and stayed dead that is as
03:5803:58 - we went over in the previous video we know that um perhaps in the Hebrew culture at the time in which Jesus was
04:0504:05 - around they had this association between sleep and death kind of in a way that we don’t so much in English it’s not that
04:1204:12 - that is never used as an association but it’s just probably not as common in our everyday speech as it was for them as a
04:1904:19 - a euphemism so you know we say things like someone passed away um and things like that but for them this was a pretty
04:2604:26 - common euphemism for death and so the point I’m making here is that most of the time when people use this euphemism
04:3404:34 - the person who they were using it of they they didn’t come back to life so in fact this is kind of an atypical case
04:4204:42 - because mostly when people said that they meant that someone is dead like is in very dead and not coming back and so
04:4804:48 - it would kind of almost undercut the exact question we’re asking here of would Jesus used this specifically to
04:5504:55 - foreshadow or uh kind of make it clear that these people were going to be awakened from their quote unquote sleep
05:0205:02 - the answer is kind of no because the very fact that he uses this the very fact that it’s a thing in their culture
05:0805:08 - that Association like 99.9% of the time doesn’t refer to people who are resuscitated because you know across the
05:1705:17 - entire biblical narrative there aren’t very many people who are ever raised from the dead um so Jesus it wasn’t just
05:2205:22 - Lazarus and Gus’s daughter there was the Widow’s son um a widow of of nine in in uh forget where exactly that is I think
05:3205:32 - it’s in Luke Luke chapter 7 I want to say um we went over that in the previous video but there really aren’t very many
05:3705:37 - instances of this so for the most part culturally they would use this expecting the person who they say is quote unquote
05:4605:46 - sleeping to stay dead um that is the euphemism that they would be using most commonly applied in the case of people
05:5405:54 - who wouldn’t be resurrected and so you can kind of see how that that means that this question I mean it’s a it’s a
05:5905:59 - reasonable question because people do wake up from sleep and people don’t come back from death and so you can kind of
06:0506:05 - see well maybe the word choice would be special because of that but actually just because of how this this euphemism
06:1006:10 - would be used culturally that kind of isn’t the right way to think about it um and so all this to say this particular
06:1906:19 - case with Lazarus um it would be more normal for people to expect Lazarus not to come back and so when Jesus says this
06:2706:27 - everyone would know that he was using it as a euphemism because as we discussed previously by the time Jesus got to
06:3406:34 - Bethany where Mary and Martha and Lazarus lived uh Lazarus had already been in tuned for four days and so
06:4206:42 - everyone clearly knows that Lazarus is dead um and so that’s why when Jesus says this they would know that he’s
06:4706:47 - using this as a euphemism for death and it wouldn’t have any significance like they wouldn’t look at him and be like
06:5406:54 - well he said he’s sleeping so that must mean that it’s something different like oh what’s Jesus going to do do now they
07:0007:00 - would understand this as a clear reference to Lazarus actually being dead now when it comes to the case of
07:0907:09 - gyrus daughter it’s basically the same thing that we talked about before so I argued in the previous video that even
07:1707:17 - though Jesus knew that she was actually dead he said what he did that is he took advantage of this association between
07:2607:26 - sleeping and death that was this common euphemism especially in their culture to kind of make things purposely ambiguous
07:3207:32 - to others so that neither he nor the girl and her family would receive as much negative attention from it and we
07:3907:39 - went into the reasons for that in the last video but the point is here that Jesus used the Sleep
07:4707:47 - terminology not because you know he was making the point that she was going to be awakened as opposed to most other
07:5407:54 - people but he was using it in association with the euphemism that we’ve gone over um specifically to make
08:0108:01 - it unclear in this particular case whether she actually was dead or not um playing off this idea that um there is
08:1008:10 - this association between these Concepts well people who weren’t in the room with them when Jesus raised her from the dead
08:1608:16 - would hear this well you know people thought she was dead her family had called the professional mourners there
08:2308:23 - was there they were mocking him saying no she’s actually dead silly why are you going in there and then Jesus does this
08:3008:30 - and says no she’s just asleep purposefully to kind of Muddy the water so that it would kind of run this
08:3708:37 - interference uh between his ministry and these people who would be wowed by the celebrity of it and the same thing with
08:4508:45 - the girl and her family like we argued in that other video uh to kind of keep all of the attention and the pressure
08:5108:51 - and even the uh you know potential for the rulers of the Jewish people at the time to Target them specifically because
09:0009:00 - um as we learn in John 12 they were seeking to kill Lazarus because his testimony basically of well I was dead
09:0909:09 - and Jesus raised me was causing people to believe and so obviously these folks had uh a personal stake in making people
09:1909:19 - not believe um you know Jesus’s uh uh the gospel was not it wasn’t subversive politically but it turned people away
09:2809:28 - from the ruling powers that be basically they couldn’t control people if people were believing the truth and so they
09:3609:36 - would seek to actually put Lazarus to death like we talked about in last video and so to spare this family that Jesus
09:4309:43 - would use this Association to make things less than clear right so people might say well uh you know people don’t
09:5009:50 - rise from the dead there’s no way he did that so she must actually only been sleeping and you know they just made a
09:5509:55 - mistake she wasn’t actually dead she just looked dead people would kind of start that rumor because of this and so
10:0310:03 - as we’ve said that’s kind of my take on why Jesus did this why he used that terminology in this case in Matthew
10:0910:09 - chapter 9 but the point is it’s still not specifically because Jesus fornew that she would be raised um as in he
10:1810:18 - would have said this you know regardless it wasn’t to foreshadow the fact that she’d be resuscitated so much as it was
10:2510:25 - to play into this whole purpose that we talked about previously all right so to finish off this video
10:3410:34 - we’re just going to talk a little bit more about the associations between sleeping and death and how that’s kind
10:4010:40 - of the relationship here not so much between sleeping and resuscitation so kind of what we just
10:4710:47 - talked about in these two cases was how in neither in John chapter 11 or Matthew chapter 9 was Jesus’s use of the
10:5510:55 - terminology kind of directly tied to the resuscitation even though it ended up turning up in both of these cases where
11:0211:02 - resuscitation was present and so that kind of what that means is that I see the association of sleeping as being
11:1011:10 - primarily with death not with resuscitation so kind of the sleeping terminology showed up here because these
11:1711:17 - people were dead in the case of Lazarus or because Jesus was trying to make it purposely ambiguous for practical
11:2411:24 - reasons in the case of Gus’s daughter not because these people were going to be
11:3011:30 - resuscitated and so further evidence that this is kind of the case that is that the association goes that direction
11:3711:37 - is that there’s actually places where sleeping is mentioned alongside death but not resuscitation so in First Kings
11:4511:45 - chapter 2 verse1 uh this reads then David slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David and so that
11:5211:52 - is a way of saying well David died and then was you know buried in the city of David um so this is a clear reference to
11:5911:59 - sleep being used for death as a euphemism but there is no Resurrection after this David was not one of the
12:0512:05 - people in the Bible that was raised from the dead so this is an example of sleeping being mentioned alongside death
12:1212:12 - in a case that has absolutely nothing to do with resusitation and there’s also kind of the reverse
12:1812:18 - case here there’s also places where resuscitation is mentioned but no mention of sleeping at all and so an
12:2512:25 - example of this comes in Acts chap 20 when Paul raises a young man named udus from the dead after he falls out of a
12:3312:33 - window when Paul was teaching late at night um so this particular story I’m not really going to pull it up but you
12:3912:39 - can check the references here acts chap 20: 7-2 uh gives this account of Paul
12:4512:45 - raising this this young man from the dead and nowhere in that account is sleeping mentioned and so uh kind of the
12:5312:53 - thesis of the question here was well could the sleeping related language be related to this idea of resuscitation
13:0113:01 - well if that were the case you know maybe we’d expect it to show up here as well so kind of runs counter to that
13:0613:06 - idea and so these observations are just kind of pointing out how the evidence here uh really does show that the Sleep
13:1513:15 - references are primarily associated with death not resuscitation and so that’s kind of how we should think about this
13:2213:22 - topic that’s where the evidence of scripture points
13:2913:29 - finally we’re just going to go into a little bit more detail about this Association here that we just introduced
13:3513:35 - between sleeping and death so first off uh kind of speaking in terms of linguistic associations the verb for
13:4413:44 - raising someone from Death so someone who has died raising them from the dead is actually the same verb as Awakening
13:5213:52 - or rousing someone from sleep in both Hebrew and Greek so this verb here C in Hebrew and a in Greek um these are the
14:0314:03 - verbs in question here and the relevant concordance entries uh for this particular type of usage that is uh when
14:1114:11 - the verbs are being used to raise people from the dead rather than waking them up from sleep um you’ll see that it’s the
14:1614:16 - same verb for both of these cases actually and so kind of why this is relevant is then you can see how closely
14:2514:25 - the concepts of sleep and death are related to each other in both Hebrew and Greek then and so that is sort of
14:3214:32 - indirect evidence we can actually see s sort of some direct references to this that kind of pushed the metaphor or push
14:4014:40 - the euphemism even further here so we’re going to look at some passages here from Jeremiah and job and just kind of show
14:4614:46 - how this association between sleeping and death is it’s mentioned right there in the Bible you know very
14:5214:52 - unambiguously so here’s one of those verses from Jeremiah Jeremiah 51:39 says this when they become heated up I will
15:0215:02 - serve them their banquet and make them drunk that they may become jubilant and may sleep a Perpetual sleep and not wake
15:1015:10 - up declares the Lord so this Perpetual sleep that they don’t wake up from that is what death would be and then another
15:1915:19 - verse same chapter a few verses later Jeremiah chapter 51: 57 says I will make her princes and her wise men drunk her
15:2815:28 - Governors her prefects and her mighty men that they may sleep a Perpetual sleep and not wake up declares the king
15:3515:35 - whose name is the Lord of hosts and so again we see this reference to a Perpetual sleep that people won’t wake
15:4115:41 - up from and this is how we clearly see that sleep is being used to refer to death and that there’s this strong
15:4815:48 - association between the concepts finally this passage here from Job chapter 14 job
15:5515:55 - 14:12 says so man lies down and does not not rise until the heavens are no longer he will not awake nor be aroused out of
16:0316:03 - his sleep so again this idea that people who are dead are sleeping until the resurrection actually um you know shows
16:1216:12 - up elsewhere um but this concept again just showing that this idea of sleeping is used of people who are dead and then
16:2116:21 - sort of similar concept here we have some passages that talk about how people who are buried uh you know as was the
16:3016:30 - funerary custom of the ancient Hebrew people as in they buried their dead rather than cremating them for example
16:3716:37 - um well it describes people who are buried as actually sleeping in the ground so Daniel chapter 12: 2 says many
16:4616:46 - of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake these to everlasting life but the others to disgrace and
16:5316:53 - everlasting contempt so actually sort of a side note here this is a reference to the resurrection here in the Book of
17:0017:00 - Daniel so not even new testament old testament here but you can see clearly that this verse is referencing those who
17:0617:06 - sleep in the dust of the ground I.E people who are dead and so again just strengthening that association between
17:1317:13 - the two concepts and so sort of where we’re going with all this is that it’s not
17:1817:18 - just by accident that these verbs overlap in usage but because of an enduring semantic relationship between
17:2517:25 - the concepts of sleeping and death that’s actually present in English as well and so to talk about this uh we’re
17:3217:32 - going to be looking at AET here from a guy named John dun um so this one’s pretty famous poem you may have heard of
17:4017:40 - it before it’s called Death be not proud so I’m gonna just going to go ahead and read through this briefly here and then
17:4717:47 - we’ll talk about several of the lines that are kind of related to uh this conceptual Association that we’re
17:5317:53 - talking about so death be not proud by John dun death be not proud though some have
18:0018:00 - called thee Mighty and dreadful for thou art not so For Those whom thou thinkest thou Dost overthrow die not for death
18:0918:09 - nor yet C thou kill me from rest and sleep which by thy pictures be much pleasure then from thee much more must
18:1718:17 - flow and soonest our best men with thee do go rest of their bones and souls delivery Thou Art slave to fate chance
18:2718:27 - Kings and desper men and dos with poison war and sickness dwell and Poppy or charms can make us sleep as well and
18:3618:36 - better than thy stroke why swellest thou then one short sleep past we wake eternally and Death Shall be more no
18:4418:44 - more death thou shalt die okay so obviously poetic language here but some of these lines that we are
18:5318:53 - going to talk about uh this line here from rest and sleep which which by th pictures be so not so much a metaphor
19:0119:01 - there but clearly linking the concepts of rest and sleep with death and then uh you know rest of their bones in this
19:1019:10 - line uh that is definitely poetic language here but you know laying someone to rest we have that turn a
19:1719:17 - phrase just in kind of normal English parlance laying someone to rest I.E burying them well that is an association
19:2419:24 - there um but perhaps most clearly we have this Poppy or charms can make us sleep as well well this is actually
19:3219:32 - directly associating sleep with death right if we’re saying that um as well here you know that is poppies and charms
19:4019:40 - can make us sleep just like how death can make us sleep that’s the association here um and then of course final line
19:4719:47 - one short sleep past we wake eternally um to the resurrection like J like Daniel chapter 12 talked about actually
19:5619:56 - um but you can kind kind of clearly see that this is an English poem um and clearly has this association between
20:0320:03 - sleep and death here in English so not that we’re going to build our theology um off of John dun sonnet but you can
20:1020:10 - kind of get the idea that the association is there even in English as well now just to close I would actually
20:1820:18 - probably think that this association between sleep and death is present in most human languages I haven’t done a
20:2420:24 - formal study of it but it kind of just makes sense for us humans to to associate these two concepts because
20:3020:30 - they do have similar surface appearances so if someone is kind of looking at someone lying on a bed from a distance
20:3820:38 - can be kind of hard to tell if the person is living or dead or if they’re just asleep um so I mean obviously
20:4520:45 - people’s chest rising and falling from breathing that’s one sign you know do they have breath because as we talked
20:5020:50 - about in our last video uh breath is actually synonymous with life um so people are alive when they have breath
20:5720:57 - that uh signifies the presence of the human spirit and when people die physically they no longer have breath
21:0421:04 - and that’s because the word for spirit and breath are synonyms in both Greek and Hebrew it’s the same word you use
21:1021:10 - the same word in Greek and Hebrew to denote uh uh breath and spirit the presence of the spirit so that’s where
21:1821:18 - we’re going to close this one um again not such a revolutionary Point here we’ve just gone through and shown that
21:2421:24 - there is a clear association between sleep and death in both Greek in Hebrew gave some examples um how the verbs are
21:3221:32 - actually the verb to wake people up is actually the same as the verb to raise them from the dead and some of these
21:3721:37 - textual examples that just show that the concepts are clearly associated in how they think about them as well as in
21:4321:43 - English and presumably in most other languages but this is all why we say that the associations are between sleep
21:4921:49 - and death much more than they are between sleep and resuscitation which was kind of the main thrust of the
21:5621:56 - initial question here all right so just to briefly recap what we’ve gone over in this video we kind of
22:0522:05 - raised the question upfront of could Jesus have been using this this language of sleep because he fornew that these
22:1222:12 - people would be resuscitated and sleep is less permanent than death um so that was kind of the question we started with
22:1822:18 - here we talked about lazarus’s case how he’d already been dead for four days between Jesus got there so when he used
22:2522:25 - that word uh people would have obviously taken it they would have known that he was referring to death in Gus’s
22:3022:30 - daughter’s case which as we talked about previously in the other video um Jesus did this primarily to kind of leave
22:3722:37 - strategic ambiguity in that situation to kind of run interference both for himself and his own ministry as well as
22:4522:45 - uh this girl and her family um so those are Jesus’s purposes in using the terminology like we argued in the last
22:5222:52 - video um but kind of more to answer the point of the question we said that sleeping is primarily associated with
22:5922:59 - death and not resuscitation so we talked about how the verbs in Greek and Hebrew for waking someone up are actually used
23:0723:07 - uh to signify raising someone from the dead the same verb is used for both things um and then we actually talked
23:1223:12 - about how that Association is present in English as well um so this is kind of closing off that question to say that
23:2123:21 - actually it’s much more likely in fact it is the case that the Sleep references here that Jesus uses uh have much more
23:2823:28 - to do with death that is the relationship that’s why he’s using these words than they did with the fact that
23:3523:35 - these particular people would be Resurrected